I have been posting videos from You Tube here for a while. I wanted to see if I could make a video. This is my attempt of doing that. I know I already posted this song this week and some of it seems the same. But, I just want to say that many times it takes great pain to close one door in your life and open a new better door. If any of you have ever hurt, you will understand what I am trying to say here. This video speaks on so many levels. Anyway I hope you like it. And since I know I can make videos now, look for more.
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Racial Profiling or Suspicious Behavior?
How the imams terrorized an airliner
By Audrey Hudson
THE WASHINGTON TIMESNovember 28, 2006
Muslim religious leaders removed from a Minneapolis flight last week exhibited behavior associated with a security probe by terrorists and were not merely engaged in prayers, according to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials.
Witnesses said three of the imams were praying loudly in the concourse and repeatedly shouted "Allah" when passengers were called for boarding US Airways Flight 300 to Phoenix.
"I was suspicious by the way they were praying very loud," the gate agent told the Minneapolis Police Department.
Passengers and flight attendants told law-enforcement officials the imams switched from their assigned seats to a pattern associated with the September 11 terrorist attacks and also found in probes of U.S. security since the attacks -- two in the front row first-class, two in the middle of the plane on the exit aisle and two in the rear of the cabin.
"That would alarm me," said a federal air marshal who asked to remain anonymous. "They now control all of the entry and exit routes to the plane."
A pilot from another airline said: "That behavior has been identified as a terrorist probe in the airline industry."
But the imams who were escorted off the flight in handcuffs say they were merely praying before the 6:30 p.m. flight on Nov. 20, and yesterday led a protest by prayer with other religious leaders at the airline's ticket counter at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
The Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation, called removing the imams an act of Islamophobia and compared it to racism against blacks. First of all Islam is not a Race. But was this really a case of Racism or Suspicious behavior? The story continues
According to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials, the imams displayed other suspicious behavior.
Three of the men asked for seat-belt extenders, although two flight attendants told police the men were not ovover sizedOne flight attendant told police she "found this unsettling, as crew knew about the six [passengers] on board and where they were sitting." Rather than attach the extensions, the men placed the straps and buckles on the cabin floor, the flight attendant said.
The imams said they were not discussing politics and only spoke in English, but witnesses told law enforcement that the men spoke in Arabic and English, criticizing the war in Iraq and President Bush, and talking about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.
The imams who claimed two first-class seats said their tickets were upgraded. The gate agent told police that when the imams asked to be upgraded, they were told no such seats were available. Nevertheless, the two men were seated in first class when removed.
A flight attendant said one of the men made two trips to the rear of the plane to talk to the imam during boarding, and again when the flight was delayed because of their behavior. Aviation officials, including air marshals and pilots, said these actions alone would not warrant a second look, but the combination is suspicious.
"They should have been denied boarding and been investigated," Mr. MacLean said. "It looks like they are trying to create public sympathy or maybe setting someone up for a lawsuit."
The pilot with another airline who talked to The Washington Times on condition of anonymity, said he would have made the same call as the US Airways pilot.
"If any group of passengers is commingling in the terminal and didn't sit in their assigned seats or with each other, I would stop everything and investigate until they could provide me with a reason they did not sit in their assigned seats."
The pilot said the airlines are not "secretly prejudiced against any nationality, religion or culture," and that the only target of profiling is passenger behavior.
"There are certain behaviors that raise the bar, and not sitting in your assigned seat raises the bar substantially," the pilot said. "Especially since we know that this behavior has been evident in suspicious probes in the past." (Read whole story here.)
No matter how the Imams are trying to spin this, the facts are by eye witness accounts that they exhibited suspicious behavior. I believe this was a ploy to get the Political Correct crowd and maybe even Congress and the Courts to relax security in our airports and on flights. We CANNOT let this happen, for once we do Terrorists will use that opening to attack us again.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 6:25:00 PM 1 comments
Monday, November 27, 2006
Held
by Natalie Grant
Are there times when you just need to be held? If so, I hope this video speaks to you.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 8:09:00 PM 0 comments
In The News...
Terrorists: Cease-fire means chance to reload
Militants say Israel-Palestinian downtime to be used
for weapons smuggling, training to attack Jewish state
Posted: November 27, 20061:00 a.m. Eastern
By Aaron Klein
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
TEL AVIV – The cease-fire to which Israel and major Palestinian factions agreed yesterday will be used by Palestinian groups to smuggle weapons into Gaza, reinforce and train "fighter units," and produce rockets for a future confrontation with the Jewish state, the leaders of the four most significant Palestinian terror groups in Gaza told WND in a series of exclusive interviews.
The cease-fire offers a period of calm for our fighters to recover and prepare for our final goal of evacuating Palestine," said Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees, a Hamas-allied terror organization in the Gaza Strip responsible for many of the recent rocket attacks against Israeli communities.
"We will keep fighting [Israel], but for the moment we will postpone certain parts of the military struggle," Abu Abir said. (Read the rest of the story here.)
Gaza Truce Holding Despite Early Violations
November 27, 2006 6:57 a.m. EST
Ryan R. Jones - All Headline News Middle East Correspondent
Jerusalem, Israel (AHN) - News that Israel and the Palestinian Authority had agreed to a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and southern Israel on Sunday was met by an immediate terrorist missile barrage on the Jewish state.
Despite that early outburst of violence, for which the Islamic Jihad terrorist organization claimed credit, the truce appeared to be holding more than 24 hours after going into effect, thanks in no small part to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's insistence that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) maintain restraint in the face of the Palestinian violations. (Read story here.)
Letting suicide bombers speak for themselves
By TOM TUGEND
The Jerusalem Post
Sixteen-year old Hassan is deeply frustrated because he was caught by Israeli police before he could blow himself up among a crowd of Israeli civilians.
"If I had been killed, my mother would call it a blessing," he says. "My family and 70 relatives would have gone to paradise, and that would be a great honor for me."
Hassan is one of more than a dozen Palestinian suicide bombers captured before they could carry out their missions and interviewed in the documentary Suicide Killers by French-Jewish filmmaker Pierre Rehov.
The movie's subtitle, "Paradise is Hell," is a deliberate allusion and counterpoint to last year's Oscarnominated Palestinian drama Paradise Now, which some critics charged "humanized" and even glorified its two suicide bombers. (Read story here.)
More Quotes from the Palestinian Would Be Suicide Bombers:
"Our goal is to kill all enemies of Islam," says one young woman.
"Those who die for Allah are not dead but live in paradise," a young man proclaims.
"Jews have never obeyed God and are not part of mankind," adds another prisoner.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 7:04:00 PM 0 comments
Beauty For Pain
by Superchick
This video is about Self Cutting. Self Cutting is the phenomenon when someone has so much emotional pain and they don’t know how to let it out, so they cut themselves to relieve the pain. But there are other destructive behaviors that people do when they cannot deal with the pain in their lives. Maybe it is overeating, or not eating at all, or drinking, or drug use. It is all done to numb the pain. I think this song could be for any of those things or even if you have been very hurt at some time. I hope the message speaks to you. And before someone thinks that is a video that I made, no it isn't. I just found it on You Tube.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 4:12:00 PM 0 comments
Sunday, November 26, 2006
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 4:18:00 PM 0 comments
Have you ever wondered why migrating geese fly in a V formation?
As with most animal behavior, God had a good reason for including that in their instincts.
As each bird flaps its wings, it creates uplift for the bird following.
In a V formation, the whole flock adds at least 71% more flying range than if each bird flew alone.
Whenever a goose falls out of formation, it suddenly feels the drag and resistance of trying to fly alone…
…and quickly gets back into formation.
Like geese…
… people who share a common direction and sense of community can get where they are going quicker and easier than those who try to go it alone.
When a goose gets tired, it rotates back into the formation and another goose flies at the point position. If people had as much sense as geese, they would realize that ultimately their success depends on working as a team, taking turns doing the hard tasks, and sharing leadership.
Geese in the rear of the formation honk to encourage those up front to up their speed. It is important that our “honking from behind” be encouraging. Otherwise it’s just - well - honking.
When a goose gets sick or wounded, two other geese drop out of formation and follow it down to help and provide protection.
They stay with the unhealthy member of the flock until it is either able to fly again or dies.
Then they launch out again with another passing flock or try to catch up with their own.
May we be so sacrificial, that we may be worthy of such friends in our time of need.
YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE A SCIENTIST...
…To learn from God’s marvelous creation; you only need to stop long enough to observe and let God reveal His wonders to you.
“Ask the beasts, and they will teach you; and the birds of the air, and they will tell you; or speak to the earth, and it will teach you; and the fish of the sea will explain to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this?”
JOB 12:7-9
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 3:35:00 PM 1 comments
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
The Real Thanksgiving Story
The Pilgrims set ground at Plymouth Rock on December 11, 1620. Their first winter was devastating. At the beginning of the following fall, they had lost 46 of the original 102 who sailed on the Mayflower. But the harvest of 1621 was a bountiful one. And the remaining colonists decided to celebrate with a feast -- including 91 Indians who had helped the Pilgrims survive their first year. It is believed that the Pilgrims would not have made it through the year without the help of the natives. The feast was more of a traditional English harvest festival than a true "thanksgiving" observance. It lasted three days.
Governor William Bradford sent "four men fowling" after wild ducks and geese. It is not certain that wild turkey was part of their feast. However, it is certain that they had venison. The term "turkey" was used by the Pilgrims to mean any sort of wild fowl.
Another modern staple at almost every Thanksgiving table is pumpkin pie. But it is unlikely that the first feast included that treat. The supply of flour had been long diminished, so there was no bread or pastries of any kind. However, they did eat boiled pumpkin, and they produced a type of fried bread from their corn crop. There was also no milk, cider, potatoes, or butter. There was no domestic cattle for dairy products, and the newly-discovered potato was still considered by many Europeans to be poisonous. But the feast did include fish, berries, watercress, lobster, dried fruit, clams, venison, and plums.
This "thanksgiving" feast was not repeated the following year. But in 1623, a period of drought was answered by colonists with a proclamation of prayer and fasting. This prayer and fasting was changed to another thanksgiving celebration when rains came during the prayers. Later that year, Governor Bradford proclaimed November 29 as a time for pilgrims to gather and "listen to ye pastor and render thanksgiving to ye Almighty God for all His blessings."
Throughout American history, there were many thanksgiving proclamations and celebrations. In 1789 George Washington proclaimed a National Thanksgiving Day on the last Thursday in November, in honor of the new United States Constitution.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 11:59:00 AM 2 comments
The Re-Writing Of American History
I saw this story last week, but in light of Thanksgiving coming in a few days and thinking about how the meaning of Thanksgiving has been changed, I got to thinking about how the history of our Country has be being changed in recent years to leave out an reference to God or Jesus. Whether you are Christian or not, whether you even believe there is a God or not; it has no bearing on what history is. The United States of America was based on Judo-Christian beliefs. Trying to change that now, because you don’t have Jud0-Christian beliefs does not change the fact that it is part of our history. Here are some stories about this:
Ten Commandments stunner: Feds lying at Supreme Court
Government tells modern visitors it's Bill of Rights being honored
Posted: November 14, 20061:00 a.m. Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Every argument before the U.S. Supreme Court and every opinion the justices deliver comes in the presence of the Ten Commandments, God's law given to Moses on a fire-scorched mountain, and now represented for the United States in the very art work carved into the high court structure.
In today's world of revisionist history, the proof comes through the work of a California pastor who visited the Supreme Court building recently when he was in Washington and was surprised that what the tour guides were telling him wasn't the same thing as what he was seeing.
"Having done some research (before the trip), I absolutely was not expecting to hear those remarks," which, he told WND, simply "denied history."
He was most disturbed by what appears to be revisionism in the presentations given to visitors at the Supreme Court. There, he said, his tour guide was describing the marble frieze directly above the justices' bench.
"Between the images of the people depicting the Majesty of the Law and Power of Government, there is a tablet with ten Roman numerals, the first five down the left side and the last five down the right. This tablet represents the first ten amendments of the Bill of Rights," she said.
Unwilling to be confrontational, he went home and started some research.
One official Supreme Court document, he found, cited a letter from sculptor Adolph A. Weinman that said the "pylon" carved with Roman numerals I to X "symbolizes the first ten amendments to the Constitution." But the letter was anomalous; it didn't have a number of certifying marks that were typical of others.
So he continued looking and after calling in some assistance in his hunt for evidence, he found a 1975 official U.S. Supreme Court Handbook, prepared under the direction of Mark Cannon, administrative assistant to the chief justice. It said, "Directly above the Bench are two central figures, depicting Majesty of the Law and Power of Government. Between them is a tableau of the Ten Commandments…"
The more I got into it (his research), the more I saw Christianity had been abandoned from history," he told WND.
When he asked, his recent tour guide denied there were any Ten Commandments representations in the Supreme Court building…
Although there are six depictions of Moses and-or the Ten Commandments at the Supreme Court, the tour guides had been trained to admit to only the one on Moses, he said.
One doesn't have to be Christian, or endorse Christianity, to recognize its influence in history, he said. (Read the whole story here.)
But the Supreme Court is not the only place they are leaving out the Judo-Christian part of our history.
Christianity being wipedfrom tales of U.S. history
Tour guides at Jamestown, Monticellodon't include Jesus' name in explanations
Posted: November 15, 20061:00 a.m. Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
When Pastor Todd DuBord visited historical sites in the Washington, D.C., area recently he was thrilled with being on the site of so many events important to the founding of the United States.
But as a history buff, he noticed quickly that one influence from the nation's early years was left out – not just once or twice – but repeatedly.
During his visit at Jamestown, he said, the tour guides several times said the first settlers arrived in America "to make money."
"While this is partially true, it was not only totally overstated by its emphasis and repetition, but there was absolutely no hint of the religious purpose given and stated under the Virginia Charter of 1606, which called for the 'propagating of Christian religion to such people as yet live in darkness and miserable ignorance of the true knowledge and worship of God.’”
He said there also was absolutely no mention of the fact the colonists' first act, after having landed at Cape Henry on April 27, 1607, "was to erect a large wooden cross and hold a prayer meeting, conducted by their minister, Reverend Robert Hunt."
"As colonist George Percy noted back then, 'The nine and twentieth day we set up a cross at Chesupioc Bay, and named the place Cape Henry,'" DuBord pointed out to the history experts.
"In fact, it seemed whenever there was an opportunity to address any of the religious characteristics or zeal of this first community, they were avoided," he said.
Later during the tour, when visitors were being led through the very heart of the replica of the community, the Anglican Church, the guide was asked about the significance of the various religious plaques, such as the Lord's Prayer and Ten Commandments, on the wall at the front of the church.
"Our guide's response was that she was unable to speak about it, a clear reference to all of us that she was trained to minimize the religious aspects of the settlement. We were all appalled, and shared so with her, especially understanding that this was an educational tour and that the religious education was being eliminated from the heart of a people who were devoutly Christian," DuBord said.
A similar situation developed at Monticello, Thomas Jefferson's home.
"Again, while our guide was cordial and informative about many matters, when asked about the religious faith of Thomas Jefferson, he abruptly and actually quite arrogantly said, 'We all know Jefferson was a strict deist [a person who believes in a Creator who does not involve Himself in the daily affairs of men], who ardently fought for the separation of Church and State,'" DeBord wrote.
The facts are that Jefferson used his political position to establish churches and distribute Bibles, DeBord found. "For example, in an 1803 federal Indian treaty, Jefferson willingly agreed to provide $300 to 'assist the said Kaskaskia tribe in the erection of a church' and to provide 'annually for seven years $100 towards the support of a Catholic priest.'"
Jefferson also set aside government lands so that Moravian missionaries might be helped in "promoting Christianity." And Jefferson once was chairman of the American Bible Society.
Jefferson's "differences with American clergy" were not about eliminating Christianity from government, but to make sure a single denomination didn't become government, DuBord said.
"Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus….I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus," Jefferson said.
"While it is true that Jefferson was an advocate for the separation of the State from the Church, he was not attempting to neuter the government from any or all religious or even Christian influence," DuBord said history shows. "Religiously speaking, Jefferson was raised Anglican (Church of England), which is partially why he (as well as others) opposed the tyranny of king, priest, or whomever." (Read the rest of the story here.)
I noticed that there was a re-writing of our history several years ago. It is wrong to change history just because you don’t agree with something. It is this kind of Political Correctness that is going to be the downfall of this Country. It is also what is letting the Muslims take over here. I hope people wake up before it is too late. If you would like to read more about the REAL history of the United States, here are a couple of my recommendations:
The Rewriting of America’s History by Catherine Millard.
The Light and the Glory by Peter Marshall and David Manuel.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 11:04:00 AM 0 comments
Sunday, November 19, 2006
It's In The Koran
This is sarcasim, so be patient and watch the whole thing.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 12:30:00 PM 0 comments
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Ok for all you Harry Potter Fans out there who can't wait for the next movie which is going to be released next June. Here is a trailor to tie you over until then.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 3:04:00 AM 0 comments
Friday, November 17, 2006
Fox News will be reairing the Obession Special during the regular Hannity and Combs time tonight, Friday, November 17. That is 7 PM Eastern Time and 8 PM Central Time. It will be replayed at 12 PM.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 6:49:00 PM 0 comments
Here is a little Tribute to the Miliary and to the Saviour Jesus Christ.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 1:51:00 PM 1 comments
This song is a little old, but it speaks to me.
"Never Alone" by Barlow Girl.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 12:05:00 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
BBC News
Pakistan's national assembly has voted to amend the country's strict Sharia laws on rape and adultery.
Until now rape cases were dealt with in Sharia courts. Victims had to have four male witnesses to the crime - if not they faced prosecution for adultery.
…A woman is raped every two hours and gang-raped every eight hours in Pakistan, according to the country's independent Human Rights Commission. Correspondents say these figures are probably an under-estimation as many rapes are not reported.
Pakistan's religious parties called the legislation "a harbinger of lewdness and indecency in the country", and against the strictures of the Koran and Sharia law.
Rape and adultery in Pakistan are dealt with under the Hudood Ordinance, a controversial set of Islamic laws introduced from 1979 by Gen Zia-ul-Haq. They include sections prescribing lashing and stoning as punishments for adultery.
Campaigners say Pakistan's laws have made it virtually impossible to prosecute rape. Attempts to pass a new bill failed in September in the face of angry opposition.
… (This new law) It would have allowed alleged rapists to be tried under civil as well as Islamic law.
The reform has been seen as a test of President Musharraf's stated commitment to a moderate form of Islam.
…"It is a historic bill because it will give rights to women and help end excesses against them," Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz told parliament after the vote. Religious parties boycotted the vote, saying the bill encouraged "free sex". (Read the story here.)
Rape is never a case of lewdness on the woman’s part. Muslims really need to learn the meaning of word. It is, however, a case of lewdness on the rapist’s part. And it is a manifestation of the Muslim male’s hatred of women and belief that females just exist for their own use just like their prophet Muhammad did. It also sounds to me like Muslim men just want to continue to have free license to rape women any time they want, just like their prophet Muhammad did. It is shameful that Muslim men are so sick and cannot control themselves. They use any excuse they can for rape. We are even hearing stories of how Muslim men are raping Christian women in the Sudan today. The Hypocrisy of Islam and Muslims, when they say the West is promiscuous. Yet they think they should have freedom to rape any time they want. And they have the example of Muhammad, the Hadiths and Sharia Law to back them up. As we can see, the rape of Muslim females seems to be the norm in Islamic countries. Here is just a few of the links to stories about how common it is for Muslim men to rape:
Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway - Authorities Look the Other Way
Symposium: To Rape an Unveiled Woman
On 'Muslim Rape, Feminist Silence'
Convert to Islam or we'll rape you
That is just 7 links out of hundreds of them. But let’s examine what the Islamic view is of these kinds of rape from the Quran, Hadiths and the writings of Islamic Scholars.
And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands (as prisoners of war) . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319). (See also Suras 4:3 and 33:50) In other words, ok for Muslim men to take women captive and rape them.
The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are ... married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri said: The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, send down the Qur'anic verse: "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess."[Surah 4:24] ...Sunan Abu Dawud, Book V, Chapter 711, Number 2150
“A slave is the property of his/her master. He/She is subject to the master's power, insomuch that if a master should kill his slave he is not liable to retaliation. With female slaves a master has the mulk-i-moot at, or right of enjoyment, and his children by them, when acknowledged, have the same rights and privileges as his children by his wives. A slave is incompetent to anything that implies the exercise of authority over others. Hence a slave cannot be a witness, a judge, or an executor or guardian to any but his master and his children. A slave cannot inherit from anyone, and a bequest to him is a bequest to his master.” p. 367_Digest of Islamic Law_ N. Bailli e, Premier Book House (Pakistan).
'Omar [one of the Khalifs] was once talking when his wife interjected, so he said to her: 'You are a toy, if you are needed we will call you.'"[21] And 'Amru Bin al-'Aas, also a Khalif, said: "Women are toys, so choose."[22]
This was not just 'Amru Bin al-'Aas and 'Omar's opinions. Mohammad himself said:
'The woman is a toy, whoever takes her let him care for her (or do not lose her)."[23]
The belief that a woman is a toy is of vital importance for the spiritual well being of a man. For according to the great philosopher Ghazali:
"In the company of women, looking at them, and playing with them, the soul is refreshed, the heart is rested, and the man is strengthened to the worship of God...this is why God said: 'That he might rest in her.' (Q. 7:189)"[24]
Women are viewed in Islam as just being a toy for a man’s pleasure and to be used by a man any time he pleases. Then there is the belief that a woman, who is just a toy after all, must stay in her house and covered or this warrants a rape by the Muslim man.
Quran-(33:59)---“ O Prophet ! Tell Thy wives and daughters. And the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (face) when abroad, that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And God is oft-Forgiving, most merciful.”
But Sheik Taj el-Dene Elhilaly probably stated the Muslim man’s view of rape the best in his Ramadan sermon:
Imam justifies rape of unveiled women
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Australia's top Muslim cleric rationalized a series of gang rapes by Arab men, blaming women who "sway suggestively," wear make-up and don't cover themselves in the tradition of Islam.
Sheik Taj el-Dene Elhilaly's comments in a Ramadan sermon in a Sydney mosque have stirred a furor in the country with even Prime Minister John Howard weighing in with condemnation.
The cleric also said the judge in the case, who sentenced the rapists, had "no mercy."
"But the problem, but the problem all began with who?" he said, referring to the women victims – whom he said were "weapons used by Satan."
"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?" the sheik said in his sermon. "The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred." (Read the whole story here.)
Rape is the norm in Islam. It is used to humiliate non-Muslim women. It is used to punish any woman that they perceive as being “uncovered.” It is used to fulfill their lusts. But after all they are just following their Prophet who as the Quran States:
And surely thou hast sublime morals" (Quran 68.4) and “Indeed in the Messenger of Allah you have a good example to follow" (Quran33.21).
Other Stories of Interest:
Pakistan rape victim's blog makes waves
How Pakistan's rape reform ran aground
Pakistani women speak up on rape
Sorry for this post to be so long. But this Women’s Rights is an important issue in Islam. Let’s all pray that this law will be passed and that it will be the first step in Muslim women being treated as equal human beings.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 3:04:00 PM 0 comments
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
I am adding links to help you in your debate with Muslims to expose Islam as the Evil Death Cult that it is. The first video is a funny video I found on You Tube and thought that I would share it with you. It is funny, but it does show the true face of Islam.
And I couldn't help myself, I had to post the second video. It is funny in a sick sort of way. But what is really sad is that it is a true depiction of the Islamic way of life.
I am getting used to the new Blogger so bear with me as I learn how to use it.
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 3:25:00 PM 1 comments
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Posted by SweetLady_Tiger at 12:20:00 PM 1 comments